Comments on: Congressional Testimony http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3885 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:36:51 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Roger Pielke, Jr. http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3885&cpage=1#comment-5199 Roger Pielke, Jr. Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:04:44 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3885#comment-5199 Hugh- This is great! Thanks for the link .. I'll probably blog on it next week. Thanks!! Hugh- This is great! Thanks for the link .. I’ll probably blog on it next week. Thanks!!

]]> By: Hugh http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3885&cpage=1#comment-5198 Hugh Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:58:02 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3885#comment-5198 Well, Looks like Ken Livingstone agrees with you! http://www.london.gov.uk/climatechangepartnership/docs/adapting-climate-change-london.pdf New report just released on the importance of the two-pronged approach to the future development of London (they are still, of course, continuing with the Gateway) Well,

Looks like Ken Livingstone agrees with you!

http://www.london.gov.uk/climatechangepartnership/docs/adapting-climate-change-london.pdf

New report just released on the importance of the two-pronged approach to the future development of London (they are still, of course, continuing with the Gateway)

]]> By: Mark Bahner http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3885&cpage=1#comment-5197 Mark Bahner Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:21:18 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3885#comment-5197 Hi Roger, I listened to part of your and others' testimony today. (The sound quality was terrible, so I couldn't turn it very loud.) I'll probably have some other comments, but overall I thought your comments were by far the ones most likely to actually lead to something. But I do a specific question. Your last words were, "Through oversight of the Climate Change Science Program and Climate Change Technology Program, Congress might motivate the evolution of these programs to focus more explicitly on the needs of decision makers." That may mean something to people in Congress ;-) but it's pretty abstract for civilians like me. Do you have some concrete examples you're thinking of about how Congress could change the direction of those programs? Mark Hi Roger,

I listened to part of your and others’ testimony today. (The sound quality was terrible, so I couldn’t turn it very loud.)

I’ll probably have some other comments, but overall I thought your comments were by far the ones most likely to actually lead to something.

But I do a specific question. Your last words were, “Through oversight of the Climate Change Science Program and Climate Change Technology
Program, Congress might motivate the evolution of these programs to focus more explicitly on the needs of decision makers.”

That may mean something to people in Congress ;-) but it’s pretty abstract for civilians like me. Do you have some concrete examples you’re thinking of about how Congress could change the direction of those programs?

Mark

]]>