http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=4204 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:36:51 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=4204&cpage=1#comment-9021 Nosmo Fri, 11 May 2007 17:40:23 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=4204#comment-9021 It was only those pricing plans that made solar marginally cost effective for us. But I'm in Berkeley, and don't need air conditioning (and we use very little electricity. Unfortunately we have a garage apartment on the same meter, but PG&E would only replace it with two meters and the solar system would only apply to one. So we canceled after 8 months of planning and permit applications. It was only those pricing plans that made solar marginally cost effective for us. But I’m in Berkeley, and don’t need air conditioning (and we use very little electricity. Unfortunately we have a garage apartment on the same meter, but PG&E would only replace it with two meters and the solar system would only apply to one. So we canceled after 8 months of planning and permit applications.

]]> http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=4204&cpage=1#comment-9020 Lab Lemming Fri, 11 May 2007 01:06:04 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=4204#comment-9020 Do they get the higher rates for selling power back to the grid? 'cause if they do, then you'd think the plan would be good for people who produce more than they use- which shouldn't be that hard, even somewhere as smoggy as california. Do they get the higher rates for selling power back to the grid? ’cause if they do, then you’d think the plan would be good for people who produce more than they use- which shouldn’t be that hard, even somewhere as smoggy as california.

]]>