Your issue then is with the media and not me. If you want to know what I think then, yes, you have to actually see what I’ve written and said.

Here is an example of your latest slander, which I posted up on your blog, to which you have not answered:

“Enough of your attacks and misrepresentations, that is what. This statement in this post is a completely misleading fabrication on your part: “MSM journalists who talk to me for a few minutes don’t get my position completely backwards over and over again.” Please cite just one example of a MSM journalist who has gotten my position on anything “completely backwards over and over again.” Either you can cite such a case involving me or you made this allegation up to smear me. Krstof quoted me accurately, despite your claim to the contrary, as do 99% of journalists.”

I followed this up with:

“Please post away as to your policy arguments, no worries there. I do expect that you will do more than simply ignore my comments about your continued misrepresentations.

I wrote above, “Either you can cite such a case involving me or you made this allegation up to smear me. Krstof quoted me accurately, despite your claim to the contrary, as do 99% of journalists.” You can answer this, apologize, or ignore it. Which is it Joe?”

Joe, your comment that “I didn’t call you names. Where did I do that?”

Are you serious?! I’m the “delayer 1000 du jour” about 100 times over.

Second, I didn’t call you names. Where did I do that? You keep calling me “hysterical” however.

Third, I could not disagree more with the statement — that you stand by on my blog –
“We’ve gotten this hopelessly wrong,” said Roger Pielke Jr. of the University of Colorado at Boulder, one of the authors of the Nature article. “If we approach this from reducing emissions we get nowhere. Driving Priuses may be good, but it’s not going to accomplish what we need.”

My complaint about that statement was not content-free. I believe it is a misleading statement, perhaps dangerously so.

Second, I didn’t call you names. Where did I do that? You keep calling me “hysterical” however.

Third, I could not disagree more with the statement — that you stand by on my blog –
“We’ve gotten this hopelessly wrong,” said Roger Pielke Jr. of the University of Colorado at Boulder, one of the authors of the Nature article. “If we approach this from reducing emissions we get nowhere. Driving Priuses may be good, but it’s not going to accomplish what we need.”

My complaint about that statement was not content-free. I believe it is a misleading statement, perhaps dangerously so.