Congressional Testimony
July 20th, 2006Posted by: Roger Pielke, Jr.
Here is a PDF of my Congressional testimony today before the House Government Reform Committee. We’ll link to the other testmony when available online.
Posted by: Roger Pielke, Jr.
Here is a PDF of my Congressional testimony today before the House Government Reform Committee. We’ll link to the other testmony when available online.
July 20th, 2006 at 9:21 pm
Hi Roger,
I listened to part of your and others’ testimony today. (The sound quality was terrible, so I couldn’t turn it very loud.)
I’ll probably have some other comments, but overall I thought your comments were by far the ones most likely to actually lead to something.
But I do a specific question. Your last words were, “Through oversight of the Climate Change Science Program and Climate Change Technology
Program, Congress might motivate the evolution of these programs to focus more explicitly on the needs of decision makers.”
That may mean something to people in Congress but it’s pretty abstract for civilians like me. Do you have some concrete examples you’re thinking of about how Congress could change the direction of those programs?
Mark
July 21st, 2006 at 8:58 am
Well,
Looks like Ken Livingstone agrees with you!
http://www.london.gov.uk/climatechangepartnership/docs/adapting-climate-change-london.pdf
New report just released on the importance of the two-pronged approach to the future development of London (they are still, of course, continuing with the Gateway)
July 21st, 2006 at 9:04 am
Hugh- This is great! Thanks for the link .. I’ll probably blog on it next week. Thanks!!