http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3434 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:36:51 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3434&cpage=1#comment-968 John Fleck Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:01:37 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3434#comment-968 Uggh. That should be "misrepresenting the Chicago study". Uggh. That should be “misrepresenting the Chicago study”.

]]> http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3434&cpage=1#comment-967 John Fleck Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:18:55 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3434#comment-967 On #2, I don't know if the AP story is quoting Bodman accurately, but if it is he's representing the University of Chicago Study. Here's how I summarized it[1]: "The nuclear power industry needs a federal subsidy jump-start for new plants to be competitive with coal and natural gas, according to a new study released Monday. But if coal and natural gas had to pay the full costs associated with their contribution to global warming, their economic edge over nuclear power would largely disappear, the study concluded." [1] http://www.abqjournal.com/paperboy/ia/news/state/226547nm09-21-04.htm On #2, I don’t know if the AP story is quoting Bodman accurately, but if it is he’s representing the University of Chicago Study. Here’s how I summarized it[1]: “The nuclear power industry needs a federal subsidy jump-start for new plants to be competitive with coal and natural gas, according to a new study released Monday. But if coal and natural gas had to pay the full costs associated with their contribution to global warming, their economic edge over nuclear power would largely disappear, the study concluded.”
[1] http://www.abqjournal.com/paperboy/ia/news/state/226547nm09-21-04.htm

]]>