Comments on: No Joke: 25 to 1 http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=4161 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:36:51 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Nosmo http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=4161&cpage=1#comment-8697 Nosmo Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:11:20 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=4161#comment-8697 Sorry, I screwed up the cut and paste: I meant http://tinyurl.com/2pqg69 Sorry, I screwed up the cut and paste: I meant
http://tinyurl.com/2pqg69

]]> By: Roger Pielke, Jr. http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=4161&cpage=1#comment-8696 Roger Pielke, Jr. Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:07:41 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=4161#comment-8696 Thanks Nosmo, I found it here: http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/03/1346216 Thanks Nosmo, I found it here:

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/03/1346216

]]> By: Nosmo http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=4161&cpage=1#comment-8695 Nosmo Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:47:33 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=4161#comment-8695 Also Andrew Revkin was interviewed on Democracy Now this morning. It is moderately lengthy. Good moderate interview. He discusses vulnerability and also an Inconvenient Truth. Transcript and audio file at: http://tinyurl.c Also Andrew Revkin was interviewed on Democracy Now this morning. It is moderately lengthy. Good moderate interview. He discusses vulnerability and also an Inconvenient Truth. Transcript and audio file at:

http://tinyurl.c

]]> By: Nosmo http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=4161&cpage=1#comment-8694 Nosmo Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:04:29 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=4161#comment-8694 The problem is not so much that it is just skewed, but both numbers are much too low. $40 million for adaptation is nothing--that is world wide not US spending. Even if all them money ($1 Billion) was spent on adaptation it would make only make a very small dent in world wide vulnerability. The problem is not so much that it is just skewed, but both numbers are much too low. $40 million for adaptation is nothing–that is world wide not US spending. Even if all them money ($1 Billion) was spent on adaptation it would make only make a very small dent in world wide vulnerability.

]]> By: Joseph O'Sullivan http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=4161&cpage=1#comment-8693 Joseph O'Sullivan Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:29:27 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=4161#comment-8693 I did not know that resources are so heavily skewed towards mitigation. This is an issue that needs more attention. In another NY Times article, the Supreme Court has ruled that the EPA has the authority to regulate CO2 from cars. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/02/washington/02cnd-scotus.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1175548682-B6dmX05t6/AUN/sWkn4Iyg I did not know that resources are so heavily skewed towards mitigation. This is an issue that needs more attention.

In another NY Times article, the Supreme Court has ruled that the EPA has the authority to regulate CO2 from cars.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/02/washington/02cnd-scotus.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1175548682-B6dmX05t6/AUN/sWkn4Iyg

]]>