http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3598 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:36:51 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3598&cpage=1#comment-1785 Eli Rabett Tue, 20 Sep 2005 02:22:25 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3598#comment-1785 A rather two edged headline from Kerr, for if humans are responsible for global warming, what else is to blame? A rather two edged headline from Kerr, for if humans are responsible for global warming, what else is to blame?

]]> http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3598&cpage=1#comment-1784 D. F. Linton Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:01:42 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3598#comment-1784 Do you consider this (http://techcentralstation.com/091605F.html) article to be basically incorrect? (It basically shows that Webster el al picked their interval to start at the bottom of the recent Cat 4/5 frequency cycle.) The fact that Webster et al did not even bother to visit the NHC web site to see how their uptrend fit into the historical pattern is hardly forgivable. If such an omission in a comparable context were made by an energy company funded researcher I am sure he would be denounced. Instead Webster et al are praised. Do you consider this (http://techcentralstation.com/091605F.html) article to be basically incorrect? (It basically shows that Webster el al picked their interval to start at the bottom of the recent Cat 4/5 frequency cycle.) The fact that Webster et al did not even bother to visit the NHC web site to see how their uptrend fit into the historical pattern is hardly forgivable. If such an omission in a comparable context were made by an energy company funded researcher I am sure he would be denounced. Instead Webster et al are praised.

]]>