Comments on: Boehlert on Hansen http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3717 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:36:51 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Rabett http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3717&cpage=1#comment-2891 Rabett Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:24:12 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3717#comment-2891 Not to disagree, (see how nice I am) but the attempt to gag Hansen is a political issue, so how can Boehlert politicize a political issue? I think we are well into defining is here. Not to disagree, (see how nice I am) but the attempt to gag Hansen is a political issue, so how can Boehlert politicize a political issue?

I think we are well into defining is here.

]]>
By: Roger Pielke Jr. http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3717&cpage=1#comment-2890 Roger Pielke Jr. Tue, 31 Jan 2006 05:27:03 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3717#comment-2890 Jonathan- I was just returning the tongue-in-cheekiness to you comment. I don't think that Boehlert's Republican-ness is here or there on this particular issue. He is clearly politicizing the issue, which I think falls under his job description, but recklessly? No. Jonathan-

I was just returning the tongue-in-cheekiness to you comment. I don’t think that Boehlert’s Republican-ness is here or there on this particular issue. He is clearly politicizing the issue, which I think falls under his job description, but recklessly? No.

]]>
By: Jonathan Dursi http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3717&cpage=1#comment-2889 Jonathan Dursi Tue, 31 Jan 2006 03:47:10 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3717#comment-2889 Hold on; are you really saying that Boehlert *isn't* `recklessly politicising this issue' *because* he is a Republican? Perhaps you could clarify how exactly Boehlert's being a Republican affects your position on what he says in this science-policy-interface question. Hold on; are you really saying that Boehlert *isn’t* `recklessly politicising this issue’ *because* he is a Republican? Perhaps you could clarify how exactly Boehlert’s being a Republican affects your position on what he says in this science-policy-interface question.

]]>
By: Roger Pielke, Jr. http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3717&cpage=1#comment-2888 Roger Pielke, Jr. Tue, 31 Jan 2006 03:38:27 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3717#comment-2888 Jonathan- I'd love to say all those things ;-) Except: 1. Boehlert is a Republican; 2. Boehlert is right; and 3. http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/author_pielke_jr_r/000697let_jim_hansen_speak.html Thanks! Jonathan-

I’d love to say all those things ;-) Except:

1. Boehlert is a Republican;
2. Boehlert is right; and
3. http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/author_pielke_jr_r/000697let_jim_hansen_speak.html

Thanks!

]]>
By: Jonathan Dursi http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3717&cpage=1#comment-2887 Jonathan Dursi Tue, 31 Jan 2006 03:33:43 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3717#comment-2887 Come on, Pielke, you know you want to say it... ``the liberals are just as bad'', and ``Boehlert is recklessly politicising this issue'', and ``focusing on this hurts scientific credibility, so we should ignore it''. Come on, Pielke, you know you want to say it… “the liberals are just as bad”, and “Boehlert is recklessly politicising this issue”, and “focusing on this hurts scientific credibility, so we should ignore it”.

]]>
By: Lisa Dilling http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3717&cpage=1#comment-2886 Lisa Dilling Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:03:28 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3717#comment-2886 to which I say, hear hear... to which I say, hear hear…

]]>