Comments on: RMS Response to Forecast Evaluation http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=4277 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:36:51 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Roger Pielke, Jr. http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=4277&cpage=1#comment-9275 Roger Pielke, Jr. Fri, 07 Dec 2007 15:20:36 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=4277#comment-9275 Thanks Robert for these comments, but you have completely avoided the substance of my post, which asserted that something quantitative could be said about the RMS 2006-2010 forecast. A simple question: Does RMS stand by its spring 2006 forecast that the period 2006-2010 would see total insured losses 40% above the historical average? Thanks! PS. To all commenters, we are aware that the website is rejecting some comments, for reasons we don't understand. All should be upgraded and fixed next week. Thanks for your patience. Thanks Robert for these comments, but you have completely avoided the substance of my post, which asserted that something quantitative could be said about the RMS 2006-2010 forecast.

A simple question: Does RMS stand by its spring 2006 forecast that the period 2006-2010 would see total insured losses 40% above the historical average?

Thanks!

PS. To all commenters, we are aware that the website is rejecting some comments, for reasons we don’t understand. All should be upgraded and fixed next week. Thanks for your patience.

]]>