Usable Science: A Handbook for Science Policy Decision Makers
download PDF
home Part 1: Science for Decision Making Part 2: Myths That Prevent Progress Part 3: Supply of Demand for Science Part 4: Making it Happen Part 5: Building Community References Further Information

REFERENCES AND
FURTHER READING

Bouwer, L.M., Crompton, R.P., Faust, E., Höppe, P., and Pielke, Jr., R. A., 2007. Confronting Disaster Losses, Science, Vol. 318, November 2, p. 753.

Chhetri, N., 2006. Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Ranking of Multiple Stressors on Central Arizona Water Resources, Workshop on Water Stressor Ranking, 2-3 November, Working Paper.

Chhetri, Netra and N. Chhetri (in press). Sustainability science: transition towards production of knowledge systems for sustainable development. Encyclopedia Geographic, SAGE publication (available online March 2010).

Chhetri, Netra (in review). Stressor analysis: an approach to address impacts of climate change on water supplies. Journal of American Water Resource Association.

Dilling, L., 2007. The opportunities and responsibility for carbon cycle science in the U.S., Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 10, pp. 1-4. View entire exchange.

Dilling, L., 2007. Towards science in support of decision making: characterizing the supply of carbon cycle science, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 10, pp. 48-61. View entire exchange.

Dilling, L., Mitchell, R., Fairman, D., Lahsen, M., Moser, S., Patt, A., Potter, C., Rice, C., and VanDeveer, S., 2007. How can we improve the Usefulness of Carbon Science for Decision Making? Chapter 5 in: The First State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR): The North American Carbon Budget and Implications for the Global Carbon Cycle. US Climate Change Science Program.

Dilling, L. and M.C. Lemos, (in review). Defining Usable Science: What can we learn for science policy from the seasonal climate forecasting experience?, Global Environmental Change.

Frodeman RF and Holbrook, JB. 2007. Science's Social Effects Issues in Science and Technology, Spring 2007.

Holbrook, Brook, J. 2005. Assessing the science-society relation: The case of the US National Science Foundation's second merit review criterion. Technology in Society 27 437-451

Holbrook, et al. 2009. Special Issue on the US National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion. Social Epistemology A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, Volume 23 Issue 3 & 4

Höppe, P. and R.A. Pielke, Jr. (eds.), 2006. Workshop on Climate Change and Disaster Losses: Understanding and Attributing Trends and Projections, Final Workshop Report. Hohenkammer, Germany, 25-26 May.

Lahsen, M., 2007. Earth System Governance: Research in Aid of Global Environmental Sustainability, Global Change NewsLetter, No. 70, December.

Lahsen, M., 2007. Trust Through Participation? Problems of Knowledge in Climate Decision Making. Chapter in: M. Pettinger (ed.), The Social Construction of Climate Change, Ashgate Publishing.

Lahsen, M., 2009. A science–policy interface in the global south: The politics of carbon sinks and science in Brazil, Climatic Change, Vol. 97, pp. 339–372.

Lahsen, M. and C. A. Nobre, 2007. Challenges of connecting international science and local level sustainability efforts: the case of the Large-Scale Biosphere–Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 10, pp. 62-74. View entire exchange.

Logar, N. J. and R. T. Conant, 2007. Reconciling the supply of and demand for carbon cycle science in the U.S. agricultural sector, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 10, pp. 75-84. View entire exchange.

Logar, N. 2008. Federally Funded Science for User Benefit: Policy Mechanisms for Mission-Oriented Research. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Logar, N.  2009. Towards a Culture of Application: Science and Decision Making at the National Institute of Standards & Technology. Minerva, 4, (47). 345-366.  

Logar, N., in press. Weather forecasting, climate prediction, and decision makers. Chapter in Applied Agrometeorology. K. Stigter, ed.

Lövbrand, E., 2007. Pure science or policy involvement? Ambiguous boundary-work for Swedish carbon cycle science, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 10, pp. 39-47. View entire exchange.

Maricle, G. 2008. Shaping Science: How to Turn Science Studies into Science Action, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Maricle, G. Prediction as an Impediment to Preparedness: Lessons from the US Hurricane and Earthquake Research Enterprises. (in preparation for Minerva, Special issue on public value mapping.)

Maricle, G., 2010 (in press). Unassigned Responsibilities: The Role of the Human and Social Sciences in Nanotechnology Research Priority Decisions. Science and Engineering Ethics. Special issue on Science Policy in Practice.

McNie, E., 2007. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 10, pp. 17-38. View entire exchange.

McNie, E. 2008. Co-producing useful climate science for policy: Lessons from the RISA program. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder. 292 pgs.

Meyer, Ryan 2009. Public Values and Science Values in Interagency Climate Science. (in review with Minerva)

National Research Council, 1999: Making Climate Forecasts Matter. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

National Research Council. 2006. Knowledge-action systems for seasonal-to-interannual forecasting: Summary of a workshop. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

National Research Council, 2007. Evaluating progress of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program: Methods and Preliminary Results. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

National Research Council. 2008. Research and Networks for Decision Support in the NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Program. Panel on Design Issues for the NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Program, H.M. Ingram and P.C. Stern, eds. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

National Research Council. 2009a. Restructuring Federal Climate Research to Meet the Challenges of Climate Change. Committee on Strategic Advice on the U.S. Climate Change Science Program. Division of Earth and Life Studies and Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

National Research Council. 2009b. Informing Decisions in a Changing Climate. Panel on Strategies and Methods for Climate-Related Decision Support, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Neff, Mark W. (In review). What Research Should be Done, and Why? Four Competing Visions for United States Ecology.

Pielke, Jr. RA. 1995. Usable information for policy: An appraisal of the U.S. Global Change Research Program. Policy Sciences 28:39-77.

Pielke, Jr., R. A., 2010. Creating useful knowledge: The role of climate science policy, Chapter 3 in: P.J. Driessen, P. Leroy, and W. van Vierssen (eds.), From Climate Change to Social Change, International Books Utrecht, pp. 51-67.

Pielke, Jr., R. A., Gratz, J., Landsea, C. W., Collins, D., Saunders, M., and Musulin, R., 2008. Normalized Hurricane Damages in the United States: 1900-2005. Natural Hazards Review, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp. 29-42. View Data.

Pielke, Jr., R.A., Prins, G., Rayner, S., and Sarewitz, D., 2007. Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature, Vol. 445, pp. 597-598.

Pielke, Jr., R.A. and D. Sarewitz, 2005. Bringing Society back into the Climate Debate, Population and Environment, Volume 26, Number 3, pp. 255-268.

Pielke, Jr., R. A., Wigley, T., and Green, C., 2008. Dangerous assumptions. Nature, Vol. 452, No. 3, pp. 531-532.

Prins, G., Cook., M., Green, C., Hulme, M., Korhola, A., Korhola, E.R., Pielke, Jr., R., Rayner, S., Sawa, A., Sarewitz, D., Stehr, N., and H. von Storch, 2009. How to get climate policy back on course. Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, Oxford University and London School of Economics, The Mackinder Programme, LSE.

Rayner, S., and E. Malone (eds.), 1998. Human Choice and Climate Change (4 vols). Battle Press, Columbus, Ohio

Sarewitz, D. and R. A. Pielke, Jr., 2007. The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science, Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 10, pp. 5-16. View entire exchange.

Sarewitz, D., G. Foladori, N. Invernizzi, and M. Garfinkel, 2004. Science Policy In Its Social Context, Philosophy Today, Supplement 2004, pp. 67-83.

Stokes, D. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.

 

CU Logo CSTPR logo SPARC logo CSPO logo ASU logo