Comments on: Reaction to Comments on Non-Skeptic Heretics http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3839 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:36:51 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Andrew Dessler http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3839&cpage=1#comment-4762 Andrew Dessler Thu, 25 May 2006 14:35:45 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3839#comment-4762 Roger- Just to be clear: while I support the general goal of the KP to reduce GHG emissions, I agree that it has many problems --- some are well known and can be worked around, others not so much. Ultimately, the KP is old news ... the real question is what comes after it. Coming up with a follow-on to the KP under the auspices of the FCCC has been and will continue to be problematic. In the Dessler and Parson book, where we give our personal judgment of what to do about AGW, we advocate a solution that requires ditching the FCCC and KP. Regards. Roger-

Just to be clear: while I support the general goal of the KP to reduce GHG emissions, I agree that it has many problems — some are well known and can be worked around, others not so much. Ultimately, the KP is old news … the real question is what comes after it. Coming up with a follow-on to the KP under the auspices of the FCCC has been and will continue to be problematic. In the Dessler and Parson book, where we give our personal judgment of what to do about AGW, we advocate a solution that requires ditching the FCCC and KP.

Regards.

]]> By: Daniel Collins http://cstpr.colorado.edu/prometheus/?p=3839&cpage=1#comment-4761 Daniel Collins Thu, 25 May 2006 11:16:15 +0000 http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheusreborn/?p=3839#comment-4761 Reading KV's post, I wondered how much of a sampling bias there is in associating the polar positions with commentators/bloggers. We're here because we believe something firmly enough to reister with TypeKey. I do think, though, that there are plenty of people and commentators who aren't so eager to be put in any of the three csmps. Could that be even more heretical? Reading KV’s post, I wondered how much of a sampling bias there is in associating the polar positions with commentators/bloggers. We’re here because we believe something firmly enough to reister with TypeKey. I do think, though, that there are plenty of people and commentators who aren’t so eager to be put in any of the three csmps. Could that be even more heretical?

]]>