Chu to BBC: Compromise Means New Coal

May 22nd, 2009

Posted by: Roger Pielke, Jr.

In an interview with the BBC, US Energy Secretary Steven Chu says that environmentalists in the the United States need to compromise their ambitions, such as supporting the building of new coal plants that are not outfitted with CCS. In response, Greenpeace said that action should be dictated by science not politics. Above is the interview, and below is an excerpt from Roger Harrabin’s BBC news story:

Prof Chu is a Nobel prize-winning physicist and a world expert on clean energy. But he said it was impossible to ignore political reality.

“With each successive year the news on climate change has not been good and there’s a growing sensation that the world and the US in particular has to get moving,” he said.

“As someone very concerned about climate I want to be as aggressive as possible but I also want to get started. And if we say we want something much more aggressive on the early timescales that would draw considerable opposition and that would delay the process for several years.

The US energy secretary said that awareness of climate tipping points had increased greatly only in the past five years. He added: “But if I am going to say we need to do much, much better I am afraid the US won’t get started.”

To the anger of environmentalists, he said that one compromise would be approving new coal-fired power plants without obliging them to capture and store their carbon. The UK government has made this a stipulation for new coal plants but Prof Chu declined to explain why the US government would not follow suit.

One Response to “Chu to BBC: Compromise Means New Coal”

    1
  1. Jon Frum Says:

    Tipping points? Interesting that they should use the plural. Referring, apparently, to the apocalyptic claim of the week – tipping point series. The tipping point claims have as much scientific basis as your average hot tip at the race track. Please note – when no one is talking about falsifiability, no one is talking science.