|
|||||||||||||||||
Week 3January 29, 2008 - Critiques and Interpretations of Science PolicyArticlesCalvert, J. 2006. What’s Special about Basic Research? Science, Technology & Human Values 31: 199-220 Fuller, S. 1996. A new deal for national science policy. Nature 381:274 Gibbons, Michael. 1999. Science’s new social contract with society. Nature, Vol.402, Supp. 2 Dec. 1999 Guston, David H., Retiring the Social Contract for Science, Issues in Science and Technology, Summer 2000, at: http://www.nap.edu/issues/16.4/p_guston.htm Pielke, Jr., R.A. 2005. Science Policy, in C. Mitcham (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Science, Technology and Ethics Pielke, Jr., R.A., and R. Byerly, Jr. 1998. Beyond basic and applied. Physics Today, 51(2), 42-46 Polanyi, M., 1967. The Republic of Science, Minerva, 1: 54-73 Sarewitz, D., G. Foladori, N. Invernizzi, and M. Garfinkel. 2004. Science Policy in its Social Context, Philosophy Today, v. 48(5): 67-83 TextsGreenberg, Science, Money and Politics, chapters 1-5 Sarewitz, Frontiers of Illusion, chapters 2-4 Stokes, Pasteur’s Quadrant, chapter 3 OptionalBozeman, B. and D. Sarewitz. 2005. Public values and public failure in U.S. Science Policy. Science and Public Policy, 32(2) 119-136 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||