CSTPR has closed May 31, 2020: Therefore, this webpage will no longer be updated. Individual projects are or may still be ongoing however. Please contact CIRES should you have any questions.

Maxwell Boykoff presents "Understanding Climate-Change Skepticism: Its Sources and Strategies" at the AAAS Annual Meeting, February 22, 2010

Maxwell Boykoff, ENVS Faculty at the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, will be part of a panel "Understanding Climate-Change Skepticism: Its Sources and Strategies" on Monday, February 22, 2010: 9:45 AM-11:15 AM.

Understanding Climate-Change Skepticism: Its Sources and Strategies

Monday, February 22, 2010: 9:45 AM-11:15 AM
Room 11A (San Diego Convention Center)
Conference Information

Accumulated scientific evidence, compiled by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), suggests that global warming is occurring and that human activities are a major contributing factor. Yet, even as the science supporting anthropogenic climate change (ACC) becomes stronger and more consensual, ACC remains highly controversial in the public and policy-making domains -- especially in the United States. This symposium addresses a major contributor to this anomaly, the success of contrarian scientists and other key actors in promoting climate-change skepticism throughout society. Panelists will examine the roles of the fossil fuel industry, conservative think tanks, and contrarian scientists (and their interconnections) in challenging the reality and significance of ACC, as well as the complex set of forces that appear to motivate their respective efforts. Special attention will be given to how contrarian scientists and those who help promote their views have largely managed to bypass peer-reviewed scientific journals in successfully disseminating “outlier” positions on ACC. The empirically based presentations will illuminate the factors that breed climate-change skepticism and give it considerable credibility, particularly but not exclusively in the United States. Besides helping explain why the United States has been a laggard in terms of climate change policy-making, the symposium will illustrate the difficulties of providing scientific input for societal debate and decision-making.

Riley E. Dunlap, Oklahoma State University

Stephen H. Schneider, Stanford University
and Naomi Oreskes, University of California

Myanna Lahsen, National Institute for Space Research
Anatomy of Dissent: Ethnographic Insights into Sources of Climate Change Skepticism

Maxwell T. Boykoff, University of Colorado
Exaggerating Denialism: Media Representations of Outlier Views on Climate Change

William R. Freudenburg, University of California
Use of Scientific Certainty Argumentation Methods in Climate Debates