Intelligence and Science for Policy
March 31st, 2005Posted by: Roger Pielke, Jr.
From the cover letter to the Silberman-Robb WMD report (PDF) released today is this paragraph:
“The Intelligence Community needs to be pushed. It will not do its best unless it is pressed by policymakers-sometimes to the point of discomfort. Analysts must be pressed to explain how much they don’t know; the collection agencies must be pressed to explain why they don’t have better information on key topics. While policymakers must be prepared to credit intelligence that doesn’t fit their preferences, no important intelligence assessment should be accepted without sharp questioning that forces the community to explain exactly how it came to that assessment and what alternatives might also be true. This is not “politicization”; it is a necessary part of the intelligence process. And in the end, it is the key to getting the best from an Intelligence Community that, at its best, knows how to do astonishing things.”
Seems to me that if we substitute “science” for “intelligence” in this paragraph it holds up equally well.
April 5th, 2005 at 5:04 am
Intelligence and Science for Policy
Roger Pielke, Jr. made this wry comment 31 March on the Prometheus blog:
From the cover letter to the Silberman-Robb WMD report (PDF) released today is this paragraph:
“The Intelligence Community needs to be pushed. It will not do its best unless…