Making Sense of University (Re)Organization
July 20th, 2005Posted by: Roger Pielke, Jr.
John V. Lombardi, chancellor and a professor of history at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, has a great essay on making sense of the seeming nonsense of the bureaucratic structure of universities. He writes,
“How universities are organized can confuse not only the sympathetic, casual observer of higher education but students and staff members as well… Insiders know, however, that all of these organizational permutations reflect not only significant changes in the universe of knowledge but also internal structures of personality, politics, money and power as well as the external pressures of fad, fashion or funding. Academic reorganization is a frequent exercise on university campuses, and often generates tremendous controversy because each effort signifies a potential for gain or loss in academic positioning for money, power and prestige. Although, to outsiders, the warfare that these reorganizations frequently provoke can often appear out of proportion to the stakes involved, insiders know that organizational structure can influence internal distributions of resources. Even more importantly for many faculty and students, the organizational structure serves as a prestige map.”
Read the whole essay.
July 22nd, 2005 at 8:31 pm
Why does anyone think that this is unique to universities? As in any reorganization, on campus it is simply musical chairs, and you watch who is left standing. My current favorite conglomoration is the Department of Computer Science, Audio Technology, and Physics. Guess who lost.